Tiffany v. eBay…dragging on

June 14th, 2007 § Leave a Comment

Tiffany & Co. is now arguing that the 10 additional trademarks it’s trying to include in its never ending trademark litigation with eBay were not sprung on the eve of the trial and the eBay knew about them throughout the three year discovery period. The obvious counter argument seems to be that if the trademarks were included in the litigation all along, why did Tiffany & Co. feel the need to amend their complaint to include them after the discovery period. Tiffany & Co. is using Weil Gotshal, eBay is using Arnold & Porter. This has been a cash cow for the last three years for these guys…they just don’t want it to end.

Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading Tiffany v. eBay…dragging on at robwebb2k.

meta

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.